DITI: Digital Infrared Thermal Imaging
“DITI is a valuable adjunct to mammography and ultrasound, especially in women with dense breast parenchyma.”
– The American Journal of Surgery, 2008
Thanks to continued advancements in imaging technology—sophisticated cameras, powerful computers, and cutting-edge software—digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI) now allows us to view the human body in ways that were once unimaginable.
Our state-of-the-art systems detect even the most subtle variations in the body’s thermal emissions. These signals are converted into high-resolution images, which can then be digitally enhanced to support accurate interpretation by our medical team. This powerful tool allows for early risk assessment and can aid significantly in the early detection of disease.
DITI enables us to identify the early stages of tumour development—sometimes years before it becomes detectable by physical exam or anatomical imaging. Catching abnormalities this early opens the door to less aggressive treatments that may even prevent further tumour growth.
Unlike traditional imaging methods, DITI is a safe physiological test with numerous advantages: it’s completely non-invasive, unaffected by breast density or age, and involves no exposure to ionising radiation or painful breast compression. It also provides an essential option for millions of younger women who are not included in standard screening protocols.
These younger women—shown to be at higher risk of developing aggressive forms of breast cancer—can finally access a screening method tailored to their needs.
Unfortunately, thermography is sometimes perceived as a threat or rival to mammography. This is a misunderstanding. Thermography is a test of physiology, while mammography assesses anatomy. They serve different purposes and, when used together, offer a more comprehensive picture—enhancing the accuracy of diagnosis.
Alarmingly, breast cancer rates are high among women in their early 30s, yet routine screening often doesn’t begin until age 50. By the time a tumor is detected in a 35-year-old woman, it may have been growing since her twenties.
We’re not suggesting that thermography should replace mammography. Rather, we see it as an essential, complementary tool—especially for younger women and those for whom mammography is unsuitable, such as men, post-mastectomy patients, and those wishing to avoid radiation.
Our message is clear: thermography is a safe, accessible, and effective imaging solution for all ages. It provides a powerful opportunity for earlier detection and monitoring of breast abnormalities—without adding risk.
